Publication Date
4-1998
Document Type
Presented Paper
Abstract
Using data from a pilot test of science and math, item difficulties were estimated with a one-parameter model (partial-credit model for the multi-point items). Some items were multiple-choice items, and others were constructed-response items (open-ended). Four sets of estimates were obtained: estimates for males and females, and treating omitted items as incorrect and treating omitted items as not-presented (not-reached). Then, using data from an operational test (high-stakes, for diploma endorsement), the fit of these item estimates was assessed. In science, the fit was quite good under all conditions. In math, the fit was better for girls than for boys, the fit was better when omitted items were treated as not-presented, and the gender difference in fit was smaller when the omitted items were treated as not-presented.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Recommended Citation
DeMars, C. (1998, April). Item estimates under low-stakes conditions: How should omits be treated? Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego
