•  
  •  
 

Abstract

In 2000, the University of Louisville’s Malcolm X debate team set out to change the face of intercollegiate policy debate (IPD) by making it their mission to “increase meaningful black participation” in the activity. The result was two-fold: 1) there has been a significant increase in diversity within intercollegiate policy debate since the start of the “Louisville Project” and 2) there is still work to be done in making debate “meaningful” for this new population of students. This essay intends to initiate a dialogue with coaches regarding our role in making black participation in intercollegiate policy debate meaningful. Meaningful, in this instance, should be understood beyond the scope of competition and more in terms of the preparation of students for life beyond debate. With this in mind, this essay seeks to examine three areas for consideration, the impact of the “Louisville Project” on meaningful black debate participation, student background—such as, first-generation student status, race, class, etc.—and best practices for student development beyond debate competition.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.