In this issue of The Journal, our Focus section discusses land release issues. For example, Mikkel Nedergaard (Danish Demining Group) examines how various HMA programs are attempting to develop better ways to monitor and document the socioeconomic results of their programs. Similarly, lessons learned from the development and use of DDG’s Impact Monitoring System provide examples of how to build or improve current outcome- and impact-monitoring systems. Norwegian People’s Aid’s Håvard Bach discusses using technical survey more effectively to reduce unnecessary, time-consuming and costly deployment of mine action resources.
In our Feature section, we look at best practices of residual clearance: Fran O’Grady (Defence Forces Ireland) reviews Irish Army Engineer Corps’ efforts to develop a self-sustainable nationwide capacity for conventional munitions disposal in the world’s newest nation, South Sudan. Ian Biddle of G4S Ordnance Management Ltd. discusses how the need to dispose of small arms ammunition (SAA) for short-term stability and security has traditionally outweighed the long-term need for environmentally responsible disposal. In addition, two of our authors, Erik K. Lauritzen (Lauritzen Advising) and Samuel Paunila (Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining), look at how lessons learned in one country can be applied to other post-conflict environments.
Finally, this issue’s Special Report section focuses on declining donor funding and strategies to attract new donors to unexploded ordnance/mine action programming. CISR’s Dane Sosniecki and Suzanne Fiederlein review how the mine action sector is shifting its approach to resource mobilization and allocation, and the importance of seeking diverse financial and technical funding.
"The Journal of ERW and Mine Action Issue 18.1,"
The Journal of ERW and Mine Action
: Vol. 18
, Article 1.
Available at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol18/iss1/1