Measuring Behavior Change Resulting from EORE and the Need for Complementary Risk Reduction Activities

Authors

Helaine Boyd, The HALO TrustFollow
Sebastian Kasack, Mines Advisory GroupFollow
Noe Falk Nielsen, Norwegian People's AidFollow

Abstract

Risk education (RE) in mine action has been around since 1992.[i] However, explosive ordnance risk education (EORE)[ii] operators are still struggling to measure how and whether EORE has resulted in positive behavior change.[iii] Of course, various monitoring and evaluation (M&E) methods have been pursued in the past, predominantly the use of knowledge, attitude, practice, and beliefs (KAPB) surveys; simpler pre-/post-EORE session surveys; the use of proxy indicators such as number of explosive ordnance (EO) accidents or victims; and number of explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) callouts from the community. However, these methods come with some limitations in accurately capturing behavior change. For example, survey questions linked to behavior would normally be prefaced as “what would you do if…” However, this self-reporting of behavior does not necessarily capture actual behaviors; moreover, responses may be biased toward giving the “correct answer” in order to please the organization conducting the survey. Further, research has evaluated the limits of EORE in the context of ongoing conflict, high levels of poverty, and/or insufficient clearance/ordnance disposal capacity. These circumstances lead to a lack of choices for persons living in or near an EO-contaminated environment to adopt safer behavior.

Recommended Citation

Boyd, Helaine; Kasack, Sebastian; and Nielsen, Noe Falk (2020) "Measuring Behavior Change Resulting from EORE and the Need for Complementary Risk Reduction Activities," The Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction: Vol. 24 : Iss. 1 , Article 6.
Available at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol24/iss1/6