Abstract
The relevance of risk education is widely acknowledged as reflected in the Oslo Action Plan (OAP) with its distinct chapter on ‘Mine risk education and reduction’ and five explicit actions. Good risk education must be tailored. MAG’s experience delivering explosive ordnance risk education (EORE) in four-teen countries confirms the relevance of tailoring EORE to the local reality: to people’s risk taking behaviors, to the actual explosive ordnance (EO) threat, to seasonality, availability of people for risk education sessions, and approaches that re-spect gender and diversity and take conflict sensitivity into account.
Recommended Citation
Kasack, Sebastian
(2021)
"Tailoring Explosive Ordnance Risk Education: How MAG Addresses Gender/Cultural Sensitivities and Local Risk-Taking Behavior,"
The Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction: Vol. 25
:
Iss.
2
, Article 7.
Available at:
https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol25/iss2/7
CISR Exchange video clip
Included in
Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons