Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Course Instructor

Dr. Abby Massey

Capstone Semester

Fall 2020

Date of Graduation

12-14-2020

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether silver sulfadiazine (SSD) should remain the gold standard of initial burn wound treatment or if it should be replaced with an alternative treatment that allows for faster skin cell regrowth. Methods: Database search of PubMed and Google Scholar were used to evaluate patient clinical trials with the search terms “burn”, “honey”, and “silver”. Results: Three trials met inclusion criteria. All three of the studies found significant improvement in their primary endpoint with the use of honey. The first study showed the honey group to have healing time of 13.47 +4.06 days and SSD group 15.62 + 4.40 days (p-value < 0.0001).8 The second study showed the honey group to have a healing time of 18.1 + 2.3 days and SSD group 32.6 + 3.6 days (p-value <0.05).9 The third study showed the honey group to have a healing time of 11.41 + 3.95 days, where the SSD group was 15.25 + 5.92 days (p-value 0.0049).10 Conclusion: This systematic review shows moderate evidence in support of using medical-grade honey as the gold standard for initial antimicrobial treatment for superficial partial-thickness burn wounds. However, until additional randomized, double-blinded studies comparing standardized honey products with SSD with more subjects within a smaller age range exist, we cannot recommend or discourage the use of honey over SSD.

Document Type

Capstone

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.