Preferred Name

Denton S. Warburton

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

ORCID

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8283-2489

Date of Graduation

Summer 2017

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Educational Specialist (EdS)

Department

Department of Graduate Psychology

Advisor(s)

Ashton Trice

Deborah Kipps-Vaughan

Michael Hall

Abstract

Reading interventions are a crucial component to combat barriers associated with reading difficulties. Within the education realm, nearly 50% of students who receive special education supports have a Specific Learning Disability (Gargiulo, 2006). As a result, the development and implementation of effective and targeted interventions is critical. Christian Boer developed a font called Dyslexie to help remediate reading difficulties of individuals with Dyslexia (Boer, 2011). However, studies by de Leeuw (2010) and Pjipker (2013) provide inconsistent supportive evidence, regarding the effectiveness of Dyslexie. The current study sought to examine the effectiveness of Dyslexie as compared to Arial on sight word recognition tasks. A total of 36 fourth and fifth grade students with a Specific Learning Disability read two real word lists and one pseudoword lists in either font. Results do not suggest a significant difference between either font on sight word recognition tasks. Results, future directions, and implications for School Psychologists are discussed.

Share

COinS