•  
  •  
 

International Journal of Peace Studies

International Journal of Peace Studies

Abstract

In this contribution, we attempt to make a case for the fruitful potential of a prospective coordination between the principles of conflict management (particularly Burton’s views) and Habermas’s two deontological models., the latter being the “ideal speech community” and communicative ethics. Firstly, we will enumerate the similarities between Habermas’s observations and those generated from the body of conflict management (CM) scholarship generally. We will secondly analyse the dissimilarities between those of Habermas and Burton in particular. Building on this foundation, we will thirdly assess a number of CM tools in light of Habermas’s two models, and will subsequently conclude that only two of them (integrative negotiation and analytical problem-solving (APS) workshops) are sufficiently compatible with Habermas’s proposals. By then employing a cross-cultural methodology to triangulate our findings, we will fourthly situate our discussion within the decolonisation debate presently enveloping the South African academic space. Habermas’s body of work may indeed be a valuable resource for improving conflict management techniques, even if it has taken quite long for this dialogue to get underway.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.