Publication Date

2007

Faculty Department

Department of Philosophy and Religion

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Much attention has been given to the question of ontic vagueness, and the issues usually center around whether certain paradigmatically concrete entities – cats, clouds, mountains, etc. – are vague in the sense of having indeterminate spatial boundaries.  In this paper, however, I wish to focus on a way in which some abstracta seem to be locationally vague.  To begin, I will briefly cover some territory already covered regarding certain types of “traditional” abstracta and the ways they are currently alleged to be vague.  I then wish to discuss two types of “nontraditional” abstracta and the sense in which I think some of these objects are locationally vague.  I will next reexamine some of the traditional abstracta and discuss whether any of these objects are locationally vague in the novel way suggested for the nontraditional sorts.  I’ll finish by discussing objections, and conclude with some remarks about characterizing the abstract/concrete distinction.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Included in

Metaphysics Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.