Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Date of Award

Spring 2018

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Science (BS)

Department

Department of Biology

Advisor(s)

Corey Cleland

Mark Gabriele

George Vidal

Abstract

The nociceptive withdrawal response (NWR), characterized by rapid withdrawal of stimulated body parts, can be evoked by stimulation of two classes of sensory nociceptors: Aδ and C-fibers. Previous studies revealed conflicting results concerning the factors that determine the direction and magnitude of the NWR. Some studies showed that the direction of the NWR depends upon stimulus location. In contrast, other studies, including those from our laboratory, showed that the direction of the NWR does not depend on stimulus location but rather is modulated by posture. However, it is likely that the heat stimuli delivered in our studies stimulated a mixture of C-fiber and Aδ nociceptors, in which the effect of C-fibers could have obscured the effect of Aδ nociceptors due to contrasting receptive field sizes. C-fibers have large receptive fields, sometimes encompassing the whole paw of the rat, while Aδ nociceptors have smaller receptive fields. Consequently, we hypothesized that stimulus location would affect the Aδ but not C-fiber evoked NWRs. Our overall goal was to use three different methods to preferentially stimulate Aδ nociceptors to determine if the NWR depended upon stimulus location.

Sprague-Dawley rats were placed on a mesh or glass surface, and the plantar aspect of the hind left foot was stimulated in five locations with brief electrical (200 μs), heat pulse (100 ms), or continuous short duration (<5 s) heat stimuli, all of which are known to preferentially stimulate Aδ nociceptors. Upon stimulation, the rat rapidly withdrew and then replaced its paw on the surface. The initial and final positions of the foot were recorded using a camcorder placed underneath the surface. The difference between the initial and final positions represented the NWR response vector.

Consistent with previous studies, for electrical, heat pulse, and short duration continuous heat, we found no statistically significant dependence of stimulus location on the direction and magnitude of the NWR in rostral-caudal and lateral-medial axes or in the change in foot angle from initial to final positions, even though only Aδ nociceptors were stimulated. However, the direction and magnitude could be explained in part by the initial position of foot prior to movement. For example, when the foot was initially rostral the movement was caudal, and when initially caudal the movement was rostral, thus avoiding disruption of the rat’s balance.

Our results falsify the hypothesis that Aδ-evoked NWRs vary with stimulus location and suggest, based on the effects of initial paw position, that over evolution the NWR has traded off optimal withdrawal movement direction for maintaining postural stability.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.